T-Sql Code Header Comments

In this post I want to talk about the headers that are included in most stored procedures and because I often see requirements for writing T-Sql code that include something along the lines of “all procedures MUST be well commented and adorned with a template that lists each change”, sample procedures include templates such as:

Sql procedure recommended template 1

Sql procedure recommended template 1


Sql procedure recommended template 2

Sql procedure recommended template 2

These are all taken from stack overflow: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1085672/sql-comment-header-examples

These templates all impart a sense of professionalism and care has been taken to write correct comments and we all know that dutifully ensuring comments are correct help show how well the database code has been written, except that is rarely the case. The quality of comments bears no relationship to the quality of code, in fact code is compiled by a compiler so incorrect code can be detected, incorrect comments are ignored by the compiler just as much as correct comments.

There is one section in particular that is a problem, the change history – if you use source control you have a history of changes which can be validated and checked, however if instead you rely on the comments then you are relying completely on  developers updating the comments correctly which is unlikely, either due to time constraints (i’ll fix this now and update comments later!) or potentially maliciously. If you then consider that the version history could possibly be incorrect then it can’t be trusted and if it can’t be trusted then it is irrelevant and is a waste of time.

Most templates include the name of the stored procedure, in case you don’t know how to find the name of each stored procedure is at the top of script, either after the word proc or procedure, it is sometimes surrounded by [ and ] or “‘s, if the name is in the comments then it might be after something like “Name:”, “Nombre: “, “Monkier:”, “Namesake: “, “Stage Name:”  or something more exotic:





So if we use source control (which we should) then if we take the above we have a verifiable history of who the author is (they checked in the code), when the create date is (the date it was checked in), the history which includes both comments and actual diff’s can also be taken from source control.

The above code could have been written as:

re-written with no header

re-written with no header


Not everything is useless, there is a real case for showing example usages, especially when there are multiple parameters passed in and it is good to see what possible parameters can be passed in but I think that is about it. You may also wish to include a copyright banner in amongst the header comments which can be included to keep lawyers happy and can be happily ignored by everyone else.

I have come up with a list of common things I see in headers and how they should be handled:

Template Replace With Why?
 Name  Script Header  It is already in an obvious place, if the editor has colouring (everything other than notepad) then it is nicely highlighted
 Author  Source control history  It is verified and easily retrievable
 Create Date  Source control history  It is verified and easily retrievable
 Change History  Source control history  It is verified and easily retrievable
 Description  The stored procedure name  If the name of the stored procedure does not accurately describe the action that it does then rename it!

In another post I would like to talk about comments within stored procedures but I think that is enough for now!


  1. Chetan Koriya · March 29, 2017

    Hello it is ok but how can i add this comment automatically when i Create new store procedure.
    second when i alter store procedure at that time in comment section automatically add Datetime of altering.
    Please help to do this i tried and search a lot but didn’t find any solution.

    • Ed Elliott · March 29, 2017

      Hi – I am saying don’t use comment headers!

      • Chetan Koriya · March 29, 2017

        yes sir you are right i agree with you but sir as point of learning can please help me for that

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s